Safety has always been a top priority in the oil and gas industry, and with good reason. Oil and gas operations can be extremely dangerous, and even a small mistake can result in a major accident. That’s why it’s so important to have reliable safety systems in place to protect workers and equipment. Safety instrumented systems (SIS) are one of the most important safety systems used in the oil and gas industry. SIS is designed to detect hazards and shut down operations before an accident can occur. In other words, they are the last line of defense against accidents.
SIS is required by law in many jurisdictions, and its reliability is constantly monitored by government agencies. However, despite their importance, SIS is not perfect. There have been several high-profile accidents in recent years that have been caused by SIS failures. In some cases, the SIS themselves were to blame. In other cases, human error was a factor. Either way, it’s clear that more can be done to improve the reliability of SIS.

One way to improve the reliability of SIS is to use advanced measurement technologies. These process instrumentation technologies can help to detect hazards that might otherwise go undetected. They can also provide better data for making decisions about when to shut down operations. Advanced measurement technologies are not a panacea, but they can certainly help to make SIS more reliable.

Using sensors with new technology to improve safety

Most SIS rely on sensors to detect hazards. If a sensor fails, the SIS may not be able to detect a hazard, which can lead to an accident. Many of the sensors used in SIS were installed years ago and are not designed to work with the latest technologies. As a result, they may not be able to take advantage of advances in sensor technology.
One way to improve the reliability of sensors is to use sensors with new technology. For example, many SIS use vibration sensors to detect hazards. Vibration sensors can be very effective, but they can also be susceptible to false positives. False positives occur when a sensor detects a hazard that does not actually exist. This can lead to an unnecessary shutdown, which can be costly and disruptive.
Newer vibration sensors, such as those based on MEMS (microelectromechanical systems) technology, are much less likely to generate false positives. MEMS-based sensors are also smaller and more rugged than older sensors, making them less likely to fail. As a result, using newer sensors can help to improve the reliability of SIS.

Improving measurement sensor reliability

Many SIS rely on traditional flow measurement technologies like differential pressure (DP) orifice flowmeters. However, these technologies have well-known limitations. For example, DP orifice flowmeters are not very accurate at low flow rates. This can be a problem in safety applications, where low flow rates may indicate a hazard. In addition, DP orifice flowmeters are susceptible to fouling. As the name implies, fouling occurs when a substance (such as oil or gas) sticks to the sensor, which can lead to inaccurate readings. Fouling is often a problem in oil and gas applications, where sensors are exposed to harsh conditions.
In an effort to improve the robustness of sensors, there have been numerous advancements. One such advancement is the development of more integrated DP orifice flowmeters. These flowmeters have multivariable transmitters that reduce the number of potential failure points. They also reduce complexity and maintenance by eliminating the need for multiple pressure taps. As a result, integrated DP orifice flowmeters are more reliable than traditional DP orifice flowmeters.
Vortex flowmeters are another type of flowmeter that is becoming more popular in the oil and gas industry. Vortex flowmeters measure the frequency of vortices generated by a flowing fluid. They are less affected by changes in fluid density than DP orifice flowmeters, making them more reliable. Some of the vortex flowmeters in the market have sensors that can be removed online, thus removing the need to shut down the whole process in the event of sensor failure.
The development of Coriolis mass flowmeters has also led to more reliable SIS. Coriolis mass flowmeters measure the force exerted by a flowing fluid on a rotating tube. They are not affected by changes in fluid density, making them more reliable than DP orifice flowmeters. In addition, many Coriolis mass flowmeters have self-diagnostic capabilities that can detect errors and automatically compensate for them. This helps to further improve the reliability of SIS.

Improving measurement sensor redundancy

In many cases, SIS relies on a single sensor to detect a hazard. If that sensor fails, the SIS may not be able to detect the hazard. To improve the reliability of SIS, it is important to use sensors with built-in redundancy. One way to achieve redundancy is to use voting systems. In a voting system, multiple sensors are used to detect a hazard. The outputs of the sensors are compared, and if there is disagreement, the SIS does not take action. This type of system can improve reliability by ensuring that a single sensor failure does not lead to an accident.
Another way to achieve redundancy is to use diverse sensor technologies. For example, an SIS might use both vibration and pressure sensors to detect a hazard. If one sensor fails, the other can still provide information about the hazard. This type of system can improve reliability by providing an extra layer of protection.
In some cases, it may also be possible to use spare sensors. For example, if an SIS has four pressure sensors, it can continue to function even if one sensor fails. This type of system can improve reliability by ensuring that there is always a working sensor available.

Early diagnosing of sensor or process issues

One way to improve the reliability of SIS is to diagnose issues early. This can be done using sensors with self-diagnostic capabilities. These sensors can detect errors and automatically compensate for them. This helps to prevent accidents before they happen.
In addition, it is important to have a system in place that can monitor the health of sensors. This can be done using a data logger. A data logger is a device that records information about the sensor over time. This information can be used to identify trends and potential problems. By identifying problems early, it is possible to fix them before they lead to an accident.

Conclusion

There are a number of ways to improve the reliability of SIS. One way is to use sensors with built-in redundancy. Another way is to use diverse sensor technologies. In addition, it is important to have a system in place that can monitor the health of sensors. By taking these steps, it is possible to improve the reliability of SIS and prevent accidents before they happen. Suppose you need Process Instrumentation and Control instruments, then contact PPS Professional Process Systems. We are a leading distributor of process control products. We also provide installation support, assembly, testing, configuration and calibration. For more information, visit http://www.ppspr.com/.
PPS Professional Process Systems,

Road #2 KM 44.2 Manatí PR 00674,

(787) 854-5477

 

Find us on Social Media
https://www.facebook.com/ppspr1/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/pharmaceutical-process-systems/about/